Looking for a RealTime-CTMS alternative?

Choose RealTime-CTMS if its demonstrated product scope, implementation process and written terms fit your site. A publicly listed feature is a starting point, not evidence that every module is included in a particular quote. Ask the vendor to show one of your schedule patterns and explain the responsible user and record at each handoff. Keep the evaluation about fit, not a claim that another product lacks a feature because a public page did not describe it.

Choose Kyros Trials if connected core site workflows and published subscription terms match your needs after a practical review. Starter, Site and Network have different limits and optional AI availability. Ask to inspect a Day 1 window, source correction, consent assignment and sponsor item with your coordinator, investigator and finance staff. The right decision depends on the workflow and contract, not a broad promise of superiority.

Before leaving RealTime-CTMS, obtain the relevant export specification and confirm access to original records. Review participants, actual visit dates, documents, negotiated fees and the historical signature and audit evidence separately. A CSV can move values without reconstructing how they changed in the previous system. Keep the old system available under your retention arrangement and ask its provider about read-only archive terms.

Use the switching guide to plan the review. Kyros Trials has participant/visit mapping presets for CRIO, RealTime and generic spreadsheets; other exports require manual field review. Documents and fee schedules are an assisted migration scope rather than an automatic participant-CSV function. Review row errors, reconcile counts and inspect sample records before your staff approve the transition. Free migration is not a guarantee of a fixed go-live date or preservation of every historical event.